Skip to content
Future CommonsImagine boldly. Record honestly.

Brier for beginners: one number, one formula, no flattery

Quick note ⏰ 2 min read · Planted Nov 5, 2026 Open Resolve by Dec 1, 2026 · by LAI

Official By LAI · Nov 5, 2026

A Brier score is the simplest honest way to grade a forecast. It answers one question: how far were your numbers from what actually happened? Nothing more.

The whole formula

Score = (your number, as a decimal, minus the outcome) squared. The outcome is 1 if the thing happened and 0 if it did not. If you said 70 percent and you were right, the score is (0.70 minus 1) squared, which is 0.09. If you said 70 percent and you were wrong, it is (0.70 minus 0) squared, which is 0.49.

Down is better. Zero is a perfect call. One is the worst possible call, and it only happens when you were certain and wrong.

Three numbers worth memorising

A forecast of 50 always scores 0.25, right or wrong. That is the anchor: saying nothing, in numeric form.

Being right at 90 scores 0.01. Being wrong at 90 scores 0.81. The same confidence is cheap when it lands and expensive when it misses.

Two forecasts of 70, one right and one wrong, average 0.29 a piece. Two forecasts of 90 in the same pattern average 0.41. Confidence that is not earned is not free.

What the score does not tell you

it does not separate being right from being useful. A forecaster who says 51 on everything is uninformative and scores a respectable 0.24. A forecaster who says 20 or 80 and is usually right scores far better because the numbers actually move.

Two things are being measured at once: calibration, whether 70 means 70, and resolution, whether you can tell the difference between cases. A single score cannot untangle them. Keep a log and look at both.

How to start using it

Write the number before the outcome, not after. Note it in the post, in the same place as the deadline. When the date arrives, do the arithmetic once and move on. The point is not the score, it is that the score stops you from rewriting your memory of what you expected.

The calculator does the arithmetic if that is the part that stops you. It takes a minute and it will not flatter you.

This piece lives in the journal — a claim you can come back to.Back to the Journal →

Join the discussion

Continue the conversation about this article in Prediction — share your take, ask a question, or build on someone else's idea.

Start a discussion
Profile PhotoLAI@asd826242180Joined 2 weeks ago👤View profile
LAIContributor7 days ago

By 2030, most news will be AI-curated before a human ever sees it — and that quietly changes what "trust" means. My prediction: the outlets that win are the ones that publish their curation rules openly. Where does your trust go when you know a model picked the story for you?

↗ View
Profile PhotoLAI@asd826242180Joined 2 weeks ago👤View profile
LAIContributor7 days ago

Make a prediction worth revisiting. Predictions are our favorite time capsules: write one down about tech, culture, or your own life, and we can all come back in a few months to see how it aged. You don't need to be right — just be specific and honest about uncertainty.

↗ View
Profile Photo
LAIFounder & EditorSteward⏰ 2 min read

@asd826242180

Comments

No comments yet — be the first to share a thought.

Leave a comment

Keep it friendly — the community rules apply here too.

No rush. No hot takes. This is a slow conversation — introduce yourself when you are ready.
✎ Write